| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs A8 9600


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9600 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 9600 gets 92.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.2 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
660f51
Core
Comet Lake-U
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
32.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
92.52k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
11.66k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
14.96k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
3.33k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
2.8k (x0.6)
TOTAL
56.64k
32.75k (x0.58)

Multithread

i3-10110U

9600
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
38.61k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
38.92k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
11.57k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.43k (x0.86)
TOTAL
106.58k
92.52k (x0.87)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
594 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
599 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
178 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
1423 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
4400 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
979 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
824 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
9632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4