Core i3-10110U vs i5-12400F
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 3.7 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 3.7 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
90675
Core
Comet Lake-U
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
399.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
7.43k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
18.64k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
13.15k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
14.82k (x3.44)
TOTAL
28.98k
54.04k (x1.86)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
36.23k (x4.89)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
134.76k (x4.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
84.06k (x8.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
16.71k (x5.1)
TOTAL
50.13k
271.76k (x5.42)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
24.18k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
23.85k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
14.42k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
14.87k (x3.5)
TOTAL
43.87k
77.32k (x1.76)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
122.98k (x4.82)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
168.77k (x4.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
96.11k (x8.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
16.32k (x5.08)
TOTAL
80.85k
404.19k (x5)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
24.24k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
24.74k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
13.95k (x2.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
14.47k (x3.4)
TOTAL
45.22k
77.41k (x1.71)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
126.87k (x4.85)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
186.48k (x4.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
92.37k (x8.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
15.45k (x4.72)
TOTAL
84.17k
421.18k (x5)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
33.85k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
20.33k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
10.51k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
11.77k (x2.51)
TOTAL
56.64k
76.46k (x1.35)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
174.21k (x3.63)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
141.31k (x3.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
64.86k (x6.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
19.01k (x4.78)
TOTAL
106.58k
399.39k (x3.75)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4