| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
50654
Core
Comet Lake-S
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
3k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
12.29k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
3.64k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
6.55k (x0.79)
TOTAL
36.97k
25.46k (x0.69)

Multithread

i3-10105

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
20.42k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
95.83k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
30.88k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
9.7k (x2.71)
TOTAL
123.2k
156.83k (x1.27)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
18.78k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
16.25k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
3.99k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
6.8k (x0.82)
TOTAL
68.92k
45.82k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-10105

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
133.55k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
108.43k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
30.02k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
9.48k (x2.67)
TOTAL
253.93k
281.48k (x1.11)

Performance/W
i3-10105
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4