| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs i7-9700F


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 190.4 k points while the i7-9700F gets 269.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
269.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
4.67k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
17.16k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.7k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
14.37k (x1.73)
TOTAL
36.97k
41.9k (x1.13)

Multithread

i3-10105

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
26.31k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
97.53k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
31.53k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
8.94k (x2.5)
TOTAL
123.2k
164.31k (x1.33)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
16.8k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
24.08k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
6.06k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
13.98k (x1.65)
TOTAL
53.77k
60.93k (x1.13)

Multithread

i3-10105

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
92.79k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
135.13k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
33.29k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
8.64k (x2.43)
TOTAL
190.38k
269.85k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i3-10105
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
886 points/W
1428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1548 points/W
2079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
440 points/W
512 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
2929 points/W
4152 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3679 points/GHz
3575 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5244 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1923 points/GHz
2975 points/GHz
TOTAL
12219 points/GHz
12964 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4