Core i3-10105 vs i7-4790
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4790 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
44.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
173.89k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
4.51k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
11.24k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.03k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
5.02k (x0.6)
TOTAL
36.97k
25.8k (x0.7)
Multithread
i3-10105
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
15.72k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
54.99k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
23.87k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
5.48k (x1.53)
TOTAL
123.2k
100.06k (x0.81)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
13.52k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
11.94k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
4.96k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
4.84k (x0.57)
TOTAL
53.77k
35.25k (x0.66)
Multithread
i3-10105
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
54.7k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
52.41k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
24.5k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
6.77k (x1.9)
TOTAL
190.38k
138.37k (x0.73)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
14.07k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
12.63k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
5.35k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
4.98k (x0.63)
TOTAL
53.83k
37.03k (x0.69)
Multithread
i3-10105
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
57.88k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
60.83k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
24.4k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
6.95k (x1.98)
TOTAL
195.29k
150.07k (x0.77)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
22.19k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
12.45k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
5.11k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
4.98k (x0.6)
TOTAL
68.92k
44.73k (x0.65)
Multithread
i3-10105
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
87.14k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
58k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
22.75k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
6k (x1.69)
TOTAL
253.93k
173.89k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i3-10105
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
1037 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
691 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
2070 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
5547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1279 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
11183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4