Core i3-10105 vs i5-9400F
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
67.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
331.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
27.15k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
23.63k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
5.38k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
11.61k (x1.4)
TOTAL
68.92k
67.77k (x0.98)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
156.61k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
138k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
29.45k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
7.14k (x2.01)
TOTAL
253.93k
331.19k (x1.3)
Performance/W
i3-10105
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
2409 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
2123 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
5095 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
6622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5763 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
2831 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
16528 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4