| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs i5-9300H


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-9300H gets 244.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
244.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
3.38k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
12.84k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
4.6k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
6.23k (x0.75)
TOTAL
36.97k
27.05k (x0.73)

Multithread

i3-10105

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
11.6k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
48.01k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
17.05k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
3.88k (x1.09)
TOTAL
123.2k
80.54k (x0.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
26.62k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
23.38k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
5.52k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
12.05k (x1.45)
TOTAL
68.92k
67.57k (x0.98)

Multithread

i3-10105

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
107.95k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
104.02k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
24.4k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
7.74k (x2.17)
TOTAL
253.93k
244.1k (x0.96)

Performance/W
i3-10105
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
2312 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
542 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
5424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
6493 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5703 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
2938 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
16480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4