Core i3-10105 vs i5-8265U
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
143.23k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
3.68k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
16.08k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
4.99k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
7.95k (x0.96)
TOTAL
36.97k
32.69k (x0.88)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
14.29k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
61.15k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
16.53k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
3.72k (x1.04)
TOTAL
123.2k
95.69k (x0.78)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
13.6k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
20.03k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
5.19k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
7.05k (x0.83)
TOTAL
53.77k
45.87k (x0.85)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
51.42k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
77.48k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
16.65k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
3.69k (x1.04)
TOTAL
190.38k
149.24k (x0.78)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
13.66k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
21.17k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
5k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
8.11k (x1.03)
TOTAL
53.83k
47.94k (x0.89)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
51.36k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
79.72k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
16.61k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.75k (x1.07)
TOTAL
195.29k
151.44k (x0.78)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
19.19k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
17.47k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
4.04k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
5.97k (x0.72)
TOTAL
68.92k
46.67k (x0.68)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
64.43k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
61.91k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
13.36k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
3.52k (x0.99)
TOTAL
253.93k
143.23k (x0.56)
Performance/W
i3-10105
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
9548 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4