| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs i5-5675R


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
40671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
4.14k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
14.35k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
4.94k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
5.47k (x0.66)
TOTAL
36.97k
28.91k (x0.78)

Multithread

i3-10105

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
16.02k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
54.6k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
18.69k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
16.87k (x4.72)
TOTAL
123.2k
106.18k (x0.86)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
12.86k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
16.85k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
5.19k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
5.49k (x0.65)
TOTAL
53.77k
40.39k (x0.75)

Multithread

i3-10105

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
50.07k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
64.61k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
19.84k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
17.09k (x4.8)
TOTAL
190.38k
151.6k (x0.8)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
12.88k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
18.27k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
5.12k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
5.45k (x0.69)
TOTAL
53.83k
41.72k (x0.78)

Multithread

i3-10105

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
49.91k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
70.3k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
19.69k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
16.92k (x4.83)
TOTAL
195.29k
156.83k (x0.8)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
21.91k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
18.59k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
5.2k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
5.72k (x0.69)
TOTAL
68.92k
51.43k (x0.75)

Multithread

i3-10105

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
84.92k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
72.09k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
20.13k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
17.07k (x4.8)
TOTAL
253.93k
194.2k (x0.76)

Performance/W
i3-10105
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4