Core i3-10105 vs i5-5300U
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-5300U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-5300U gets 76.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 3.3 times faster than the i5-5300U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-5300U gets 76.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 3.3 times faster than the i5-5300U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306d4
Core
Comet Lake-S
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2021
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
38.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
76.71k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
17.2k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
14.53k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
3.44k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
3.12k (x0.38)
TOTAL
68.92k
38.29k (x0.56)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
28.7k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
35.19k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
9.24k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
3.57k (x1)
TOTAL
253.93k
76.71k (x0.3)
Performance/W
i3-10105
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
2346 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
616 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
238 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
5114 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i5-5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
5931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5011 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1076 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
13204 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4