Core i3-10105 vs i5-3320M
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 195.3 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 3.3 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 195.3 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 3.3 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2021
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
58.81k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
3.21k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
9.05k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
3.94k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
3.93k (x0.47)
TOTAL
36.97k
20.13k (x0.54)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
6.08k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
19.02k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
8.85k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
3.98k (x1.11)
TOTAL
123.2k
37.93k (x0.31)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
10.89k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
9.77k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
3.98k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
3.77k (x0.45)
TOTAL
53.77k
28.4k (x0.53)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
20.23k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
20.83k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
9.49k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
4.04k (x1.14)
TOTAL
190.38k
54.6k (x0.29)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
10.64k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
10.53k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
4.07k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
3.97k (x0.5)
TOTAL
53.83k
29.22k (x0.54)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
21.27k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
23.93k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
9.48k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.12k (x1.18)
TOTAL
195.29k
58.81k (x0.3)
Performance/W
i3-10105
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
608 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1627 points/W
684 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
428 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
3004 points/W
1680 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3662 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5481 points/GHz
3191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/GHz
1234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
12235 points/GHz
8853 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4