Core i3-10105 vs i5-10400T
Description
Both models i3-10105 and i5-10400T are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
4k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
14.19k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
4.62k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
11.03k (x1.33)
TOTAL
36.97k
33.84k (x0.92)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
22.77k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
96.59k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
31.65k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
2.45k (x0.69)
TOTAL
123.2k
153.46k (x1.25)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
12.61k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
17.94k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
4.83k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
10.81k (x1.28)
TOTAL
53.77k
46.19k (x0.86)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
74.62k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
119.63k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
32.65k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
2.52k (x0.71)
TOTAL
190.38k
229.42k (x1.21)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
12.5k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
19.05k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
4.72k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
10.3k (x1.31)
TOTAL
53.83k
46.57k (x0.87)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
74.58k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
126.96k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
31.76k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.5k (x0.71)
TOTAL
195.29k
235.8k (x1.21)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
22k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
19.98k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
4.57k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
11.31k (x1.36)
TOTAL
68.92k
57.85k (x0.84)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
136.69k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
135.25k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
32.76k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
2.48k (x0.7)
TOTAL
253.93k
307.18k (x1.21)
Performance/W
i3-10105
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4