| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs Celeron G3900TE


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 190.4 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 3.9 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2021
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
49.34k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
2.36k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
9.79k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
3.08k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
3.36k (x0.4)
TOTAL
36.97k
18.59k (x0.5)

Multithread

i3-10105

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
4.45k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
18.16k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
5.48k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
3.5k (x0.98)
TOTAL
123.2k
31.59k (x0.26)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
8.56k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
12.25k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
3.17k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
3.35k (x0.4)
TOTAL
53.77k
27.33k (x0.51)

Multithread

i3-10105

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
16.42k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
23.61k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
5.75k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
3.55k (x1)
TOTAL
190.38k
49.34k (x0.26)

Performance/W
i3-10105
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
886 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1548 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
440 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
2929 points/W
1410 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3679 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5244 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1923 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
12219 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4