Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 2 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 2 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
17.57k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
27.38k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
9.35k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
23.9k (x2.88)
TOTAL
68.92k
78.2k (x1.13)
Multithread
i3-10105
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
176.08k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
219.88k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
100k (x3.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
12.93k (x3.63)
TOTAL
253.93k
508.89k (x2)
Performance/W
i3-10105
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4