Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 2 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 2 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
497.74k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
4.47k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
17.41k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
8.23k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
25.15k (x3.03)
TOTAL
36.97k
55.26k (x1.49)
Multithread
i3-10105
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
36.1k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
178.65k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
95.98k (x3.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
16.03k (x4.49)
TOTAL
123.2k
326.76k (x2.65)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
17.17k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
25.32k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
8.36k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
27.86k (x3.29)
TOTAL
53.77k
78.71k (x1.46)
Multithread
i3-10105
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
136.06k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
195.06k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
97.81k (x3.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
12.91k (x3.63)
TOTAL
190.38k
441.85k (x2.32)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
16.76k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
25.16k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
8.76k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
24.3k (x3.08)
TOTAL
53.83k
74.98k (x1.39)
Multithread
i3-10105
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
131.36k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
198.51k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
97.27k (x3.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
13.4k (x3.82)
TOTAL
195.29k
440.54k (x2.26)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
17.1k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
26.59k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
8.91k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
23.21k (x2.8)
TOTAL
68.92k
75.81k (x1.1)
Multithread
i3-10105
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
172.04k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
214.03k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
97.1k (x3.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
14.57k (x4.1)
TOTAL
253.93k
497.74k (x1.96)
Performance/W
i3-10105
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4