Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen 5 5600X
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 1.7 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 1.7 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2021
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
435.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
23.28k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
25.58k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
11.72k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
25.45k (x3.07)
TOTAL
68.92k
86.03k (x1.25)
Multithread
i3-10105
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
135.28k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
180.56k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
80.27k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
38.94k (x10.95)
TOTAL
253.93k
435.05k (x1.71)
Performance/W
i3-10105
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
6693 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4