| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen 5 2600X


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
333.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
15.75k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
26.29k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
5.91k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
18.48k (x2.23)
TOTAL
68.92k
66.44k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-10105

2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
94.49k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
182.53k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
45.95k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
10.15k (x2.85)
TOTAL
253.93k
333.12k (x1.31)

Performance/W
i3-10105
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
3507 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4