| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.3 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
3.8k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
17.38k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.17k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
3.16k (x0.38)
TOTAL
36.97k
29.52k (x0.8)

Multithread

i3-10105

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
15.28k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
76.44k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
27.48k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
3.02k (x0.84)
TOTAL
123.2k
122.2k (x0.99)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
13.95k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
20.7k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
5.33k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
3.03k (x0.36)
TOTAL
53.77k
43.01k (x0.8)

Multithread

i3-10105

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
58.56k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
92.95k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
28.55k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
2.98k (x0.84)
TOTAL
190.38k
183.04k (x0.96)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
13.04k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
22.35k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
5.37k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
3.4k (x0.43)
TOTAL
53.83k
44.15k (x0.82)

Multithread

i3-10105

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
56.49k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
100.74k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
28.21k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.04k (x0.87)
TOTAL
195.29k
188.49k (x0.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
14.2k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
23.23k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
5.35k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
5.18k (x0.62)
TOTAL
68.92k
47.96k (x0.7)

Multithread

i3-10105

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
58.24k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
105.72k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
28.73k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
5.59k (x1.57)
TOTAL
253.93k
198.27k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i3-10105
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4