| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.5 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
3.95k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
18.36k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.39k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
17.35k (x2.09)
TOTAL
36.97k
45.06k (x1.22)

Multithread

i3-10105

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
19.47k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
77.19k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
15.4k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
12.25k (x3.43)
TOTAL
123.2k
124.3k (x1.01)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
14.63k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
24.09k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
5.51k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
15.86k (x1.91)
TOTAL
68.92k
60.09k (x0.87)

Multithread

i3-10105

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
48.75k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
80.1k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
24.5k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
19.85k (x5.58)
TOTAL
253.93k
173.2k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i3-10105
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4