| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen 3 3350U


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.8 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
144.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
13.25k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
21.67k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
4.79k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
3.98k (x0.48)
TOTAL
68.92k
43.7k (x0.63)

Multithread

i3-10105

3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
46.47k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
78.38k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
16.69k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
3.3k (x0.93)
TOTAL
253.93k
144.84k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i3-10105
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
9656 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4