| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs FX 9590


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 195.3 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.4 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
600f20
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vishera
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
65 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
137.65k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
11.51k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
9.57k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
4.19k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
7.14k (x0.91)
TOTAL
53.83k
32.41k (x0.6)

Multithread

i3-10105

9590
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
55.13k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
51.69k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
27.02k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.81k (x1.09)
TOTAL
195.29k
137.65k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i3-10105
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1627 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
428 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
3004 points/W
626 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3662 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5481 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
12235 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4