| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs i7-1185G7


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
24.35k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
20.07k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
8.61k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
7.84k (x0.95)
TOTAL
68.92k
60.87k (x0.88)

Multithread

i3-10105

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
93.58k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
94.71k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
33.28k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
9.34k (x2.63)
TOTAL
253.93k
230.91k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i3-10105
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4