Core i3-10105 vs i5-11300H
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
25.83k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
23.56k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
9.2k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
5.06k (x0.61)
TOTAL
68.92k
63.64k (x0.92)
Multithread
i3-10105
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
116.87k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
121.08k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
41.8k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
6k (x1.69)
TOTAL
253.93k
285.75k (x1.13)
Performance/W
i3-10105
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4