| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-720QM


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-720QM is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 173.3 k points while the i7-720QM gets 38.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 4.5 times faster than the i7-720QM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
106e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Clarksfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
13.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
38.78k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
1.49k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
3.4k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
1.95k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
2.08k (x0.27)
TOTAL
32.73k
8.92k (x0.27)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
4.23k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
11.4k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
7.17k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
4.51k (x1.17)
TOTAL
114.81k
27.32k (x0.24)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
5.49k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
3.55k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
2.01k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
2.09k (x0.25)
TOTAL
47.22k
13.13k (x0.28)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
15.06k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
12.15k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
7.18k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
4.39k (x1.14)
TOTAL
173.34k
38.78k (x0.22)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
841 points/W
335 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1396 points/W
270 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
371 points/W
160 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
2667 points/W
862 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
3218 points/GHz
1962 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4602 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1228 points/GHz
717 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1934 points/GHz
745 points/GHz
TOTAL
10982 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4