| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-9850H


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
289.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.11k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
15.19k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.04k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
11.98k (x1.56)
TOTAL
32.73k
36.32k (x1.11)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
22.68k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
83.77k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
30.37k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
8.55k (x2.22)
TOTAL
114.81k
145.37k (x1.27)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
14.5k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
20.73k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
5.31k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
11.09k (x1.33)
TOTAL
47.22k
51.62k (x1.09)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
77.18k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
126.35k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
33.63k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
7.87k (x2.04)
TOTAL
173.34k
245.03k (x1.41)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
19.83k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
16.52k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
3.87k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
9.02k (x1.07)
TOTAL
60.06k
49.24k (x0.82)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
130.19k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
121.44k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
28.05k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
9.62k (x2.49)
TOTAL
227.67k
289.3k (x1.27)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
6429 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4