| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-9750H


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
276.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.53k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
18.24k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.76k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
13.01k (x1.69)
TOTAL
32.73k
41.54k (x1.27)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
24.3k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
97.88k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
29.85k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
11.93k (x3.09)
TOTAL
114.81k
163.95k (x1.43)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
16.32k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
23.42k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
6.04k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
13.24k (x1.59)
TOTAL
47.22k
59.03k (x1.25)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
86.92k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
126.14k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
29.62k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
11.86k (x3.08)
TOTAL
173.34k
254.54k (x1.47)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
16.31k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
24.48k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.87k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
13.02k (x1.59)
TOTAL
48.19k
59.67k (x1.24)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
87.54k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
131.05k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
28.47k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
11.8k (x3.06)
TOTAL
175.24k
258.87k (x1.48)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
25.22k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
21.97k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.02k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
10.71k (x1.27)
TOTAL
60.06k
62.92k (x1.05)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
125.56k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
115.86k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
25.63k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
9.4k (x2.43)
TOTAL
227.67k
276.46k (x1.21)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4