| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-7560U


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.3 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806e9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
97.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
3.56k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
12.71k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
3.93k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
8.89k (x1.16)
TOTAL
32.73k
29.09k (x0.89)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
6.34k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
29.51k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
8.94k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
14.72k (x3.81)
TOTAL
114.81k
59.51k (x0.52)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
12.78k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
18.79k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
4.72k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
8.95k (x1.08)
TOTAL
47.22k
45.24k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
23.04k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
40.07k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
10.08k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
15.24k (x3.95)
TOTAL
173.34k
88.42k (x0.51)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
12.88k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
20.02k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.15k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
8.97k (x1.09)
TOTAL
48.19k
46.02k (x0.95)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
23k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
41.21k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
9.92k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
14.9k (x3.87)
TOTAL
175.24k
89.03k (x0.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
19.37k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
17.26k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
3.78k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
7.75k (x0.92)
TOTAL
60.06k
48.16k (x0.8)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
39.17k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
38.24k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
8.9k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
10.97k (x2.84)
TOTAL
227.67k
97.27k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
6485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4