Core i3-10100T vs i7-3770
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-3770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-3770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
34.59k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
133.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
12.55k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
12.11k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.69k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
5.25k (x0.64)
TOTAL
48.19k
34.59k (x0.72)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
49.56k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
56.21k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
22.17k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
5.75k (x1.49)
TOTAL
175.24k
133.7k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
844 points/W
644 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1433 points/W
730 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
288 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
2696 points/W
1736 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
3228 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4869 points/GHz
3104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1907 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
11208 points/GHz
8870 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4