| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-6300HQ


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-6300HQ gets 159.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.4 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2015

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
18893 (-22.28%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
16234 (-26.70%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
3832 (-25.47%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
6145 (-27.35%)
TOTAL
60056
45104 (-24.90%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
74035 (-27.05%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
66345 (-32.33%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
15180 (-37.48%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
3802 (-1.58%)
TOTAL
227670
159361 (-30.00%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1474 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
337 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
3541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5073 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1920 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
14095 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9