| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.05k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
15.29k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
9.04k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
10.54k (x1.37)
TOTAL
32.73k
38.92k (x1.19)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
9.05k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
33.88k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
15.34k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
6.74k (x1.74)
TOTAL
114.81k
65.01k (x0.57)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
7.07k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
10.55k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
5.27k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
5.66k (x0.68)
TOTAL
47.22k
28.56k (x0.6)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
25.28k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
37.48k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
17.77k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
6.92k (x1.79)
TOTAL
173.34k
87.45k (x0.5)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
13.9k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
20.13k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
9.41k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
10.59k (x1.29)
TOTAL
48.19k
54.03k (x1.12)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
55.4k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
59.01k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
22.83k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
6.7k (x1.74)
TOTAL
175.24k
143.94k (x0.82)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
25.53k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
19.99k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
9.31k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
10.81k (x1.28)
TOTAL
60.06k
65.64k (x1.09)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
58.46k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
57.31k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
20.1k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
6.81k (x1.76)
TOTAL
227.67k
142.69k (x0.63)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4