Core i3-10100T vs i3-10105
Description
Both models i3-10100T and i3-10105 are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.5k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
18.39k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.78k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
8.3k (x1.08)
TOTAL
32.73k
36.97k (x1.13)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
16.13k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
75.62k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
27.88k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.57k (x0.93)
TOTAL
114.81k
123.2k (x1.07)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
16.19k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
23.07k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
6.04k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
8.46k (x1.02)
TOTAL
47.22k
53.77k (x1.14)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
57.59k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
100.63k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
28.59k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.56k (x0.92)
TOTAL
173.34k
190.38k (x1.1)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
16.11k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
24.12k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.71k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
7.89k (x0.96)
TOTAL
48.19k
53.83k (x1.12)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
58.25k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
105.73k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
27.8k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.51k (x0.91)
TOTAL
175.24k
195.29k (x1.11)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
28.9k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
25.85k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.88k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
8.29k (x0.98)
TOTAL
60.06k
68.92k (x1.15)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
111.69k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
110.23k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
28.45k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.56k (x0.92)
TOTAL
227.67k
253.93k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4