| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 9 4900HS


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-S
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2020

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
14866 (-38.84%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
21530 (-2.79%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
8393 (63.22%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
8214 (-2.89%)
TOTAL
60056
53003 (-11.74%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
124632 (22.81%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
158618 (61.79%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
69791 (187.43%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
7533 (95.00%)
TOTAL
227670
360575 (58.38%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
10302 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9