| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3600 gets 370.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
4145 (-4.15%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
15920 (1.43%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
7660 (52.10%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
23541 (206.60%)
TOTAL
32734
51265 (56.61%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
25694 (54.91%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
127917 (79.92%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
68347 (193.81%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
41155 (965.82%)
TOTAL
114806
263112 (129.18%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
15375 (11.10%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
21941 (10.89%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
7972 (50.93%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
24757 (197.74%)
TOTAL
47222
70045 (48.33%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
96913 (77.27%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
135120 (48.96%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
70389 (191.97%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
56426 (1,363.86%)
TOTAL
173341
358847 (107.02%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
15042 (8.37%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
20947 (0.05%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
8569 (65.55%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
21710 (164.70%)
TOTAL
48194
66267 (37.50%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
94356 (71.94%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
141735 (52.12%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
69379 (197.29%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
32723 (748.96%)
TOTAL
175244
338193 (92.98%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
15835 (-34.86%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
24313 (9.78%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
8665 (68.52%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
21426 (153.31%)
TOTAL
60056
70239 (16.96%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
122648 (20.85%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
152187 (55.23%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
68898 (183.75%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
27038 (599.91%)
TOTAL
227670
370772 (62.86%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1887 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2341 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1060 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
416 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
5704 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5789 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2063 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
5102 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
16724 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9