Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.2k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
17.36k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
7.5k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
23.79k (x3.1)
TOTAL
32.73k
52.85k (x1.61)
Multithread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
22.11k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
108.04k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
56.81k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
36.39k (x9.43)
TOTAL
114.81k
223.36k (x1.95)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
15.38k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
21.94k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
7.97k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
24.76k (x2.98)
TOTAL
47.22k
70.05k (x1.48)
Multithread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
96.91k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
135.12k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
70.39k (x2.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
56.43k (x14.64)
TOTAL
173.34k
358.85k (x2.07)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
15.04k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
20.95k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
8.57k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
21.71k (x2.65)
TOTAL
48.19k
66.27k (x1.38)
Multithread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
94.36k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
141.73k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
69.38k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
32.72k (x8.49)
TOTAL
175.24k
338.19k (x1.93)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
16.04k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
24.47k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
8.38k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
21.66k (x2.56)
TOTAL
60.06k
70.55k (x1.17)
Multithread
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
113.63k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
143.55k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
63.84k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
27.34k (x7.08)
TOTAL
227.67k
348.35k (x1.53)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4