| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 5 1600


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
303.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
14.08k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
22.56k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.19k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
16.71k (x1.98)
TOTAL
60.06k
58.53k (x0.97)

Multithread

i3-10100T

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
86.62k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
168.1k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
43.51k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
5.16k (x1.34)
TOTAL
227.67k
303.4k (x1.33)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
4668 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4