| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.7 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
3.75k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
17.22k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
9.79k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
8.21k (x1.07)
TOTAL
32.73k
38.97k (x1.19)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
9.19k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
35.47k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
19.14k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
5.82k (x1.51)
TOTAL
114.81k
69.62k (x0.61)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
12.9k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
21.4k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
10.73k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
8.16k (x0.98)
TOTAL
47.22k
53.19k (x1.13)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
30.31k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
45.13k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
20.17k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
5.77k (x1.5)
TOTAL
173.34k
101.38k (x0.58)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
14.65k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
21.57k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
9.93k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
8.02k (x0.98)
TOTAL
48.19k
54.18k (x1.12)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
32.14k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
43.54k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
19.58k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
5.61k (x1.46)
TOTAL
175.24k
100.87k (x0.58)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
24.25k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
21.63k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
9.09k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
7.23k (x0.86)
TOTAL
60.06k
62.19k (x1.04)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
56.9k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
55.68k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
19.29k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
6.09k (x1.58)
TOTAL
227.67k
137.96k (x0.61)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4