Core i3-10100 vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
55.41k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
162.33k points
343.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.74k
20.99k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.31k
11.9k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
4.72k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.65k
3.75k (x0.49)
TOTAL
55.41k
41.36k (x0.75)
Multithread
i3-10100
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
71.95k
172.62k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
67.7k
110.03k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.43k
44.06k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.25k
16.93k (x2.71)
TOTAL
162.33k
343.64k (x2.12)
Performance/W
i3-10100
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1107 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1042 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
2497 points/W
2545 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5288 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4724 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1095 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1779 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
12886 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4