Core i3-10100 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
406f1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
55.41k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
162.33k points
237.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.74k
12.16k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
20.31k
11.82k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
3.02k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.65k
2.4k (x0.31)
TOTAL
55.41k
29.39k (x0.53)
Multithread
i3-10100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
71.95k
103.77k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
67.7k
102.28k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.43k
26.13k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.25k
5.65k (x0.9)
TOTAL
162.33k
237.83k (x1.47)
Performance/W
i3-10100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1107 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1042 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
2497 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5288 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4724 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1095 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1779 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
12886 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4