Core i3-10100 vs i5-10400T
Description
Both models i3-10100 and i5-10400T are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.41k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
162.33k points
307.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.74k
22k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.31k
19.98k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
4.57k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.65k
11.31k (x1.48)
TOTAL
55.41k
57.85k (x1.04)
Multithread
i3-10100
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
71.95k
136.69k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
67.7k
135.25k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.43k
32.76k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.25k
2.48k (x0.4)
TOTAL
162.33k
307.18k (x1.89)
Performance/W
i3-10100
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1107 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1042 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
2497 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5288 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4724 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1095 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1779 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
12886 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4