Core i3-10100 vs i3-8130U
Description
The i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ea
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
55.41k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
162.33k points
88.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.74k
21.09k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.31k
19.41k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
4.05k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.65k
2.8k (x0.37)
TOTAL
55.41k
47.35k (x0.85)
Multithread
i3-10100
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
71.95k
38.23k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
67.7k
38.89k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.43k
8.75k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.25k
2.47k (x0.4)
TOTAL
162.33k
88.35k (x0.54)
Performance/W
i3-10100
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1107 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1042 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
2497 points/W
5890 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5288 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4724 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1095 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1779 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
12886 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4