Core i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.7 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.7 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Barcelo
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
55.41k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
162.33k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.74k
18.57k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
20.31k
22.03k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
9.55k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.65k
20.5k (x2.68)
TOTAL
55.41k
70.65k (x1.28)
Multithread
i3-10100
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
71.95k
92.92k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
67.7k
128.4k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.43k
54.82k (x3.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.25k
5.13k (x0.82)
TOTAL
162.33k
281.26k (x1.73)
Performance/W
i3-10100
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
1107 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1042 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
2497 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
5288 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4724 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1095 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1779 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
12886 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4