| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100 vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.41k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
162.33k points
210.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22.74k
22.97k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
20.31k
21.61k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
8.99k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.65k
8.52k (x1.11)
TOTAL
55.41k
62.1k (x1.12)

Multithread

i3-10100

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
71.95k
82.75k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
67.7k
86.58k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.43k
29.34k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.25k
11.72k (x1.88)
TOTAL
162.33k
210.4k (x1.3)

Performance/W
i3-10100
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1107 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1042 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
2497 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5288 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4724 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1095 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1779 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
12886 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4