| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.4 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
50654
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1005G1
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.07k
3k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
13.76k
12.29k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8k
3.64k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.59k
6.55k (x0.99)
TOTAL
31.42k
25.46k (x0.81)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
8k
20.42k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
35.53k
95.83k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.53k
30.88k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
9.7k (x2.26)
TOTAL
66.36k
156.83k (x2.36)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
18.78k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
16.25k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
3.99k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
6.8k (x1.07)
TOTAL
50.62k
45.82k (x0.91)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
133.55k (x2.87)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
108.43k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
30.02k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
9.48k (x2.24)
TOTAL
116.63k
281.48k (x2.41)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4