| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 98.9 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 6.4 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
306e4
Core
Ice Lake-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
12 /24
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1005G1
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.07k
3.44k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
13.76k
9.54k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8k
4.21k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.59k
3.94k (x0.6)
TOTAL
31.42k
21.13k (x0.67)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8k
73.17k (x9.14)
Test#2 (FP)
35.53k
230.83k (x6.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.53k
107.14k (x5.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
7.99k (x1.86)
TOTAL
66.36k
419.12k (x6.32)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
10.52k
10.64k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.6k
9.53k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
4.12k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
3.62k (x0.55)
TOTAL
43.44k
27.91k (x0.64)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
26.86k
252.69k (x9.41)
Test#2 (FP)
42.38k
238.68k (x5.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.65k
115.5k (x5.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
10.98k (x2.61)
TOTAL
94.1k
617.84k (x6.57)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
10.53k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
9.98k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.43k
4k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
3.4k (x0.74)
TOTAL
39.93k
27.92k (x0.7)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
29.07k
247.05k (x8.5)
Test#2 (FP)
46.14k
264.43k (x5.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.47k
111.01k (x5.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
10.66k (x2.55)
TOTAL
98.86k
633.14k (x6.4)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1938 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3076 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
279 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
6591 points/W
4870 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3510 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4996 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1890 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4