| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 10 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
406f1
Core
Ice Lake-U
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
14/28
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
35840 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
1162.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
17.8k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
16.51k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
4.47k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
2.56k (x0.4)
TOTAL
50.62k
41.35k (x0.82)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
494.82k (x10.64)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
514.13k (x10.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
132.87k (x7.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
20.8k (x4.92)
TOTAL
116.63k
1162.63k (x9.97)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
9689 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4