| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.9 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
306f2
Core
Ice Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1005G1
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.07k
3.52k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
13.76k
8.68k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8k
2.83k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.59k
3.13k (x0.48)
TOTAL
31.42k
18.17k (x0.58)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8k
32.7k (x4.09)
Test#2 (FP)
35.53k
105.18k (x2.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.53k
35.18k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
9.54k (x2.22)
TOTAL
66.36k
182.59k (x2.75)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10.52k
11.08k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
17.6k
9.57k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
3.18k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
3.28k (x0.5)
TOTAL
43.44k
27.11k (x0.62)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
26.86k
139.07k (x5.18)
Test#2 (FP)
42.38k
133.47k (x3.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.65k
46.6k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
6.65k (x1.58)
TOTAL
94.1k
325.78k (x3.46)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
11.18k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
10.06k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.43k
3.21k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
3.12k (x0.68)
TOTAL
39.93k
27.57k (x0.69)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
29.07k
140.98k (x4.85)
Test#2 (FP)
46.14k
145.37k (x3.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.47k
45.62k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
6.75k (x1.61)
TOTAL
98.86k
338.73k (x3.43)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
18.62k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
10.49k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
4.04k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
3.26k (x0.51)
TOTAL
50.62k
36.41k (x0.72)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
236.25k (x5.08)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
151.05k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
58.9k (x3.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
6.7k (x1.58)
TOTAL
116.63k
452.9k (x3.88)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4