| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon E5-1660 v4


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 98.9 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 3.2 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
406f1
Core
Ice Lake-U
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
320.49k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
12.41k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
17.23k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.43k
4.89k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
3.07k (x0.67)
TOTAL
39.93k
37.6k (x0.94)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
29.07k
102.11k (x3.51)
Test#2 (FP)
46.14k
156.5k (x3.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.47k
42.08k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
19.8k (x4.73)
TOTAL
98.86k
320.49k (x3.24)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1938 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3076 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
279 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
6591 points/W
2289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3510 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4996 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1890 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4