| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs i9-9900K


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 4.5 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ed
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
529.32k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1005G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.07k
5k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
13.76k
20.22k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8k
6.54k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.59k
13.78k (x2.09)
TOTAL
31.42k
45.53k (x1.45)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
8k
36.39k (x4.55)
Test#2 (FP)
35.53k
166.55k (x4.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.53k
54.92k (x2.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
8.96k (x2.09)
TOTAL
66.36k
266.82k (x4.02)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.52k
18.03k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
17.6k
25.98k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
6.86k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
14.5k (x2.21)
TOTAL
43.44k
65.37k (x1.5)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
26.86k
131.34k (x4.89)
Test#2 (FP)
42.38k
204.76k (x4.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.65k
55.74k (x2.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
8.99k (x2.14)
TOTAL
94.1k
400.83k (x4.26)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
17.98k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
27.04k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.43k
6.63k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
13.6k (x2.96)
TOTAL
39.93k
65.24k (x1.63)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
29.07k
130.88k (x4.5)
Test#2 (FP)
46.14k
208.5k (x4.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.47k
54.12k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
8.91k (x2.13)
TOTAL
98.86k
402.41k (x4.07)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
32.08k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
28.17k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
6.68k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
14.98k (x2.35)
TOTAL
50.62k
81.91k (x1.62)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
242.98k (x5.22)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
220.16k (x4.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
53.97k (x3.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
12.22k (x2.89)
TOTAL
116.63k
529.32k (x4.54)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4