| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs i9-10900KF


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 7.1 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0655
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
10/20
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
825.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
35.87k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
31.43k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
7.34k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
15.73k (x2.46)
TOTAL
50.62k
90.37k (x1.79)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
377.56k (x8.12)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
347.59k (x7.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
88.08k (x5.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
12.24k (x2.89)
TOTAL
116.63k
825.47k (x7.08)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4