| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs i5-7400


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7400 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906e9
Core
Ice Lake-U
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
173.7k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
12.72k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
19.3k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.43k
4.76k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
8.73k (x1.9)
TOTAL
39.93k
45.52k (x1.14)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
29.07k
47.95k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
46.14k
71.98k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.47k
17.22k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
8.03k (x1.92)
TOTAL
98.86k
145.18k (x1.47)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
22.37k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
19.46k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
4.44k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
6.41k (x1)
TOTAL
50.62k
52.69k (x1.04)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
79.57k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
71.41k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
16.44k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
6.27k (x1.48)
TOTAL
116.63k
173.7k (x1.49)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
1224 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
1099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
2672 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
5561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
15053 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4