| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs Celeron N5095


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 94.1 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 1 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906c0
Core
Ice Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
93.26k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
10.52k
10.08k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
17.6k
10.11k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
4.06k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
2.36k (x0.36)
TOTAL
43.44k
26.6k (x0.61)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
26.86k
36.86k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
42.38k
38.51k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.65k
15.17k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
2.72k (x0.65)
TOTAL
94.1k
93.26k (x0.99)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
1791 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2825 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
281 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
6273 points/W
6217 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3095 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5177 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2577 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1926 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
12775 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4